Is The Trinity In Matthew?

Is the Trinity in Matthew?
“A true and accurate knowledge of the Trinity is a blessing in and of itself . . . the Trinity is the highest revelation God has made of himself to His people. It is the capstone, the summit, the brightest star in the firmament of divine truths”—The Forgotten Trinity, page 10
“The Gospel according to Matthew . . . no other was so frequently quoted in the noncanonical literature of earliest Christianity”—Preface to Matthew in the New American Bible (NAB)
If the Trinity doctrine is true, then the first gospel, the Gospel of Matthew, should provide numerous evidences of it. Let’s carefully examine all the pertinent evidence. Is the Trinity in Matthew? If Jesus is Almighty God, we should find abundant evidence of it in the first gospel, Matthew. Let’s carefully examine all the pertinent evidence. Is Jesus God in Matthew 1?
Matthew 1:1,18 – “Jesus the Messiah”. “This is how Jesus the Messiah was born.” (NLT). Almighty God is not “the Messiah”. Thus, Matthew opens up his, the first gospel written, with two declarations that Jesus is the Messiah. If his purpose in writing had been to introduce Jesus as God, he would have said so. But he didn’t.
DOES THE TITLE-NAME “IMMANUEL” MEAN JESUS IS GOD?
Matthew 1:23 – “‘Behold, the virgin shall be with child and bear a son, and they shall name him Emmanuel,’ which means ‘God is with us'” (NAB). Says Jesus would be called “Immanuel” – God is with us (does not mean Jesus is God). Why? The meanings of many Jewish names include “Yahweh” or “God.” The following scriptures help us get a better view of this situation:
- 1 Kings 17:1 – Elijah – My God is Yahweh
- Isaiah 1:1 – Isaiah – Salvation of Yahweh
- Jeremiah 1:1 – Jeremiah – Yahweh Loosens or Exalts
- Jeremiah 1:1 – Hilkiah – My Portion is Yahweh
- Jeremiah 1:3 – Zedekiah – Yahweh is Our Righteousness
- Jeremiah 36:10 – Gemariah – Yahweh has Perfected
- Jeremiah 36:11 Micaiah – Who is Like Yahweh
- Jeremiah 36:12 – Shemaiah – Yahweh has Heard
- Jeremiah 36:12 – Hananiah – Yahweh has Shown Favor/Been Gracious
- Jeremiah 36:14 – Nethaniah – Yahweh has Given
- Jeremiah 36:14 – Shelemiah – Yahweh is Recompense, or Communion Sacrifice of Yahweh
- Jeremiah 36:14 – Neriah – My Lamp is Yahweh
- Jeremiah 38:1 – Gedaliah – Great is Yahweh
- Jeremiah 38:6 – Malchijah – My King is Yahweh
- Daniel 1:6 – Daniel – My Judge is God
- Joel 1:1 – Joel – Yahweh is God
- Micah 1:1 – Micah – Who is Like Yahweh?
- Zephaniah 1:1 – Zephaniah – Yahweh has Concealed
- Zechariah 1:1 – Zechariah – Yah has Remembered
God or Yahweh is often imbedded within many Hebrew names. It doesn’t mean any of these men were God, just as the name Immanuel doesn’t mean that Jesus is God Almighty. Yahweh is also embedded within some Biblical place-names, but the place is obviously not “Yahweh”.
For example: “Abraham called the name of that place Yahweh Will Provide, as it is said this day, ‘In the mount of Yahweh it will be provided'”—Genesis 22:14 LSB
“Moses built an altar and named it Yahweh is My Banner”—Exodus 17:15 LSB
“In his days Judah will be saved, And Israel will dwell securely; And this is the name by which he will be called, Yahweh our righteousness”—Jeremiah 23:6 LSB
“The perimeter of that city will be six miles, and the name of the city from that day will be: ‘Yahweh Is There'”—Ezekiel 48:35 HCSB
Rather than being named “God”, or “God the Son”, notice what name Jesus was actually given: “She will give birth to a son, and YOU ARE TO GIVE HIM THE NAME JESUS”—Matthew 1:21 NIV.
Matthew 1:23 quotes Isaiah 7:14 to show how Jesus’ miraculous virgin birth fulfilled prophecy. “The Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel” (Isaiah 7:14 NIV). This was fulfilled back in the time of the prophet Isaiah and Judean king Ahaz, when a firstborn boy named Immanuel was born. The prophecy of Isaiah 7:14 also had a later and greater fulfillment in the birth of Jesus. Trinitarians often claim this title-name proves that Jesus is God. If that were true, then the child with the name Immanuel, or Emmanuel, born back Isaiah’s and Ahaz’s time would be also be God.
If we objectively consider the syntax, we’ll notice that “God is with us” is not meant in a physical sense, as Trinitarians would like us to believe. When we consider Matthew 12:30: “Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters,” we can easily see that “with me” is not meant in a physical, or spatial sense, but in a spiritual, sense. Another helpful account is after Jesus had resurrected the widow of Nain’s son, Luke 7:16 reports, “They glorified God, exclaiming, ‘A great prophet has arisen in our midst,’ and ‘God has visited his people'” (NAB). Jesus is here called “a great prophet.” ‘God had visited his people,’ not physically, or spatially, but spiritually, through Jesus. At Matthew 28:20, Jesus promised, “I am with you always, until the end of the age” (NAB). “With” is obviously not meant physically, or spatially, but spiritually, because Jesus is the one “whom heaven must keep till the universal restoration comes” (Acts 3:21 NJB).
Therefore, when the Scriptures are used in the local and also the remote context, and in harmony with the entire Bible, Matthew 1:23, which states “they will call him Immanuel” (NIV), cannot honestly or Scripturally be used to prove Jesus is God, or the Trinity in Matthew.
Who should we worship?
There are some verses that are often translated as though people actually “worshipped” Jesus. However, as mentioned above, accurate translations do not reflect that idea.
“On entering the house, they saw the child with Mary his mother; and they knelt down and paid him homage”—Matthew 2:11 NRSV
“Those who were in the boat did him homage, saying, ‘Truly, you are the Son of God'”—Matthew 14:33 NAB “And the men in the boat fell at his feet, exclaiming, ‘You must be the Son of God'”—-Matthew 14:33 REB
“When we look at the historical accounts of the early church, Acts through Revelation, do we find any valid instances of anyone worshipping Jesus? No, we don’t! Here are some examples of what we do find:
“A worshipper of God”—Acts 16:14 NASB; 18:7 NASB
“Worship God”—1 Corinthians 14:25; Revelation 19:10; 22:9
“Worshipped God”—Revelation 7:11 NASB; 11:16 NASB; 19:4 NASB
A survey of the entire New Testament finds evidence of God alone being worshipped, and no evidence of Jesus being worshipped.
Other Scriptures In Matthew
Matthew 3:16-17 – “As soon as Jesus was baptized, he went up out of the water. At that moment, heaven was opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and alighting on him. And a voice from heaven said, ‘This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased” (NIV). Trinitarians count 1,2,3 here in this verse, and say, here is the Trinity. However, notice that Almighty God calls Jesus “my Son”. Jesus is frequently called “the Son of God”, but he is never called “God the Son,” which is the often-used Trinitarian label that is never used in the Bible. Please also notice that Jesus, God, and the Holy Spirit are in separate locations.
- Jesus is in the water
- Holy Spirit in the form of dove is in the air
- God is in heaven and says, “This is my beloved son, in whom I am well pleased.”
Therefore, they cannot be the same. Not one aspect of the Trinity dogma is mentioned in Matthew 3:16,17—no equality, no Almightiness, nothing about being eternal.
Matthew 4:3,5 – The issue raised by Satan the Devil was, “If you are the Son of God”, not “If you are God,” not “if you are part of a Trinity”.
Matthew 4:10 – “Jesus said to him, ‘Go, Satan! For it is written, ‘YOU SHALL WORSHIP THE LORD YOUR GOD, AND SERVE HIM ONLY” (LSB). People must ONLY worship “the one who alone is God” (John 5:44 NAB), Jesus said. He said nothing about worshipping “the Son of God,” or “God the Son,” or a Trinity.
Matthew 6:9 – Praying to the Father; verse 10 – Jesus says your kingdom, your will, not our will, or our kingdom, which shows that God is superior. Without equality, Jesus cannot be God, and the Trinity doctrine cannot be true.
Matthew 9:2 – “When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, ‘Courage, child, your sins are forgiven'” (NAB). Jesus forgives sins. (See Acts 5:30-31.) Trinitarians claim this makes Jesus God. The following two scriptures show us why this is not the case.
Matthew 9:6 says Jesus has authority to forgive sins. “The son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins” (NAB). The ‘authority to forgive sins’ had been bestowed on Jesus as God’s “representative” (John 5:43 Williams New Testament), obviously. God doesn’t need anyone’s authority.
In fact, Matthew 9:8 says, “The crowd . . . praised God for sending a man with such great authority” (NLT 2013 edition). Jesus said, “God sent me” (John 8:42 NIV), so he could not be God.
Matthew 9:27 – Jesus is called “the Son of David”. God is not called “the Son of David” – Matthew 15:22; Matthew 20:30-31; Matthew 21:15.
Matthew 10:20 – “It will not be you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you” (NAB). On another occasion, Jesus was teaching the same thing, but he expressed it slightly differently, by saying, “the holy Spirit will teach you at that moment what you should say” (Luke 12:12 NAB). By comparison, we note that “the holy Spirit” is “the Spirit of your Father,” which indicates the holy Spirit is not a person.
Matthew 12:18 – “My servant whom I have have chosen, my beloved in whom I delight. I shall place my spirit upon him” (NAB). Almighty God is no one’s servant, but Jesus is God’s “servant” (Acts 3:13). God the Father was foretold in this prophecy quoted from Isaiah to “place his spirit upon” Jesus. The language here (“my spirit”) indicates holy spirit is obviously not a person, but God’s spirit.
Matthew 16:13-17 – “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” (NAB). – Jesus asked, Who am I? – “The Messiah, the Son of the living God” – Peter replied. My Father in heaven revealed this to you – Jesus commended his answer. If Jesus was God, or “God the Son,” this would have been the time to state it. But, no, Jesus was confessed to be “the Messiah, the Son of the living God,” and Jesus approved this answer.
Matthew 16:27 – “Son of Man will come with his angels in his Father’s glory”, not in his own glory, not in the glory of “the Trinity.”
Matthew 16:28; Matthew 17:5,9 – “A voice from the cloud said, ‘This is my Son’“, not God the Son, not the 2nd person of the Trinity. “The Son of Man coming in his kingdom,” “until the Son of Man has been raised from the dead.” God is not the Son of Man.” Since “God is not a man” (Numbers 23:19), and “God . . . will never die” (Habakkuk 1:12 NIV), and Jesus did die, it is obvious Jesus cannot be God.
Matthew 17:24-27 – “From whom do kings of the earth take toll or tax? From their sons or from others?” (ESV).The king in Jesus’ example is Almighty God. Jesus is God’s Son, who is not equal to, but subservient to, and dependent upon, his Father, Almighty God.
Matthew 18:35 – Jesus refers to “My heavenly Father” as the one who is ultimately in charge, in this case, by showing he is ultimately the one in charge of the forgiveness of sins.
Matthew 20:23 – “To sit at my right hand or my is not mine to grant, but it is for for whom it has been prepared by my Father” (ESV). Jesus, in effect, says, ‘I can’t choose who will sit at my right or left in the kingdom – only my Fathercan,’ which shows that Jesus does not have the highest position, nor is he even equal to God the Father.
Matthew 21:9 – “Blessings on the one who comes in the name of the LORD [Yahweh]” (NLT). Jesus, “the Son of Man will come . . . in the glory of his Father” (Matthew 16:27 NIV), so Jesus cannot be Almighty God.
Matthew 21:33-45 – Jesus’ Father, “the owner of the vineyard” (Matthew 21:40), sent his prophets, finally his Son. The Father is the sender, Jesus is sent. “No slave is greater than his master nor any messenger greater than the one who sent him” (John 13:16 NAB). Obviously, God the Father is greater than his Son, Jesus.
Matthew 22:2 – “The kingdom of heaven may be likened to a king gave a wedding feast for his son” (NAB). The King prepared wedding feast for son – NLTSB – The King represents God, whose Son is Jesus. The feast represents kingdom of Messiah. The “king”, God the Father, is obviously greater than the “son”, the Messiah, Jesus Christ.
Matthew 22:36 – “Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?” (NAB). In other words, this scholar of Judaism wanted to know, ‘What is the essence of your teaching?’ ‘What is the central tenet of your teaching?’ This was the perfect opportunity for Jesus to let these religious leaders know how important the Trinity doctrine is, if it is a true doctrine, and that was what Jesus was really teaching.
Matthew 22:37-39 – “He said to him, ‘You shall love the Lord, your God, with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the greatest and first commandment. The second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself'” (NAB). Notice that Jesus says nothing about any Trinity, or about any supposed equality with God. The most important command – ‘Love Yahweh your God, with all your heart, soul and strength’, Jesus said. If Jesus was equal to God, he should have been included in this statement. But Jesus did not include himself. Likewise, if the Trinity was real, the most important doctrine about God, as Trinitarians claim, it should have been mentioned here, but it’s not..
Matthew 22:41-45 – Quotes Psalm 110:1: “Yahweh says to my Lord: ‘Sit at my right hand Until I put Your enemies under Your feet'” (LSB). In Matthew 22:44 Jesus shows that the Messiah would be greater than David. Verse 45 – The answer is that Jesus is more than the son of David, he is the Son of God, but he is not greater than, or equal to, Yahweh, who is God the Father. Also Isaiah 9:6; Matthew 14:33; Psalm 45:16
Matthew 24:36 – “Of that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone” (NAB). The Son, Jesus, doesn’t know the day and hour, only God the Father does – obviously the two are different, and the Father is superior to the Son. Trinitarians’ claim that Jesus was Almighty God on earth is soundly refuted by this one scripture.
Matthew 25:34 – ‘King will say – come you who have been blessed by my Father’, who is the superior one.
Matthew 25:40 – ‘King will say – the least of these my brothers’. God doesn’t have brothers, but Jesus does. Matthew 27:37 – Jesus is said to be “the king of the Jews,” not God.
Matthew 27:42,43 – “He’s the king of Israel! . . . He trusts in God. Let God rescue him” (NIV). If Jesus was God, why would he need to trust in God?
Matthew 27:46 – “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” (NIV; NAB). Jesus’ statement proves he is not God, because he says that God left him.
Matthew 27:54 – “Surely he was the Son of God” (NIV), not “God the Son”. Matthew 28:9 – “Jesus met them on their way, and greeted them. They approached, embraced his feet, and did him homage” (NAB). Many translations use “worship” instead of “homage” here. However, “homage” is the correct rendering of the Greek “proskynesan” here, since Jesus said, “the true worshippers will worship the Father” (John 4:24). Matthew 28:17 – “When they saw him, they fell down before him, though some hesitated” (NJB). Many translations use “worship” instead of “fell down before him” here. Some translations, such as the CSB and NAB, omit the word “worship” entirely from this verse. Regardless, “fell down before him” is the correct rendering of the Greek “proskynesan” here, since Jesus said, “the true worshippers will worship the Father” (John 4:24).
Matthew 28:18 – “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me” (NIV). If Jesus was Almighty God, he would NOT have to be “given” anything, because he would already possess it. Matthew 28:19 – “Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you” (NIV). Trinitarians claim that “in the name of” means one Trinitarian name for the three. However, “of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” means the three are entirely separate and distinct. Trinitarians count, one, two, three . . . there’s the Trinity! The mention of the three together doesn’t make them a Trinity in Matthew, any more the mention of “Stephanus, Fortunatus and Achaichus” (1 Corinthians 16:17) together make them a Trinity.
Is the Trinity in Matthew? In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus is called, or referred to, many things, and in many ways, but he is never asserted to be Almighty God. This is true whether it is Jesus, his disciples, his enemies, or the narrator speaking. The holy Spirit is also referred to in a way that indicates it is not a person. Based on the scriptural facts, the Trinity is not in Matthew!
7 thoughts on “Is The Trinity In Matthew?”
Why focus on just Matthew? Look at the entire Bible. The name “Trinity” does not appear in the Bible. The term is a later invention. However, the concept of the Trinity is presented in the Bible, even though it has been misinterpreted and misunderstood.
Definition of Trinity: 5-27-2025
The Trinity is a hypothetical team of three hypothetical supernatural persons – God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit – who allegedly work together for common goals under the leadership and supervision of God, the captain of the team. The Bible implies the existence of the Trinity, but never mentions the name of it. Although Jesus Christ never existed, Jesus of Nazareth did. We now know and have proven that God does not exist. Many people, even Christians, misunderstand or distort the concept of the Trinity.
GW—Why focus on just Matthew? Look at the entire Bible
BA—This website has many articles about the Trinity. The article about Matthew is only one of mnny.
For example, the issue of the Trinity is analyzed on 26 out 27 NT books, as well as the OT books of Deuteronomy, Isaiah and the Minor Prophets. Plus there are also many other articles about the Trinity on this website. Look under “Categories” and go to “Trinity”.
GW—The name “Trinity” does not appear in the Bible. The term is a later invention.
BA—True.
GW— However, the concept of the Trinity is presented in the Bible, even though it has been misinterpreted and misunderstood.
BA_–Not so.
“The belief as so defined was reached only in the 4th and 5th centuries AD and hence is not explicitly and formally a biblical belief”—Dictionary of the Bible by Roman Catholic scholar John L McKenzie, S. J.
GW1—The name “Trinity” does not appear in the Bible. The term is a later invention.
BA2—True.
GW2: So, we agree on that point.
GW1— However, the concept of the Trinity is presented in the Bible, even though it has been misinterpreted and misunderstood.
BA2_–Not so. “The belief as so defined was reached only in the 4th and 5th centuries AD and hence is not explicitly and formally a biblical belief”—Dictionary of the Bible by Roman Catholic scholar John L McKenzie, S. J.
GW2: The three persons – God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit – are all identified in the Bible, long before the 4th and 5th century. They are said to have exhibited the same values and goals, but God was superior to the other two. However, they were not conceived as a specific group or TEAM until the latter.
GW2: As I said, “The Trinity is a hypothetical team of three hypothetical supernatural persons – God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit – who allegedly work together for common goals under the leadership and supervision of God, the captain of the team. The Bible implies the existence of the Trinity, but never mentions the name of it. Although Jesus Christ never existed, Jesus of Nazareth did. We now know and have proven that God does not exist. Many people, even Christians, misunderstand or distort the concept of the Trinity.”
GW2: The three persons – God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit – are all identified in the Bible, long before the 4th and 5th century.
BA—Trinitarians have used some scriptures out of context to assert “proof” of their dogma that the holy Spirit is a person. Is the holy Spirit a person? This article analyzes some of the assertions Trinitarians have made about certain scriptures, claiming the holy Spirit is a person. These so-called “proofs of the personhood of the holy Spirit” are each debunked, one by one, as follows. The Trinitarian “proofs” of “the personhood of the holy Spirit” are shown in italics, and the Biblical explanations of truth follow each one.
But having a ‘mind’ does. Romans 8:27 — ‘interceeding’ for us does. Romans 8:26
Romans 8:16,26,27 – “The Spirit itself bears witness with our spirit that we are the children of God . . . the Spirit itself intercedes with inexpressible groanings. And the one who searches hearts knows what is the intention of the Spirit, because it intercedes for the holy ones according to God’s will” (NAB). These verses use the pronouns “itself” and “it” to describe the holy Spirit. The pronouns “it” and “itself” do not describe a person, proving that the holy Spirit is not a person. Without the holy Spirit being a person, the Trinity doctrine collapses.
having the ability to ‘speak’ does. Acts 8:29 Acts 10:19 Acts 11:12 Romans 8:16 1 Timothy 4:1 1 John 5:6 Revelation 2:7 Revelation 14:13 Revelation 22:17
‘agreeing’ does. 1 John 5:8
Acts 8:29 – “The Spirit said to Philip, ‘Go and join up with that chariot'” (NAB). Trinitarians claim that here, when the scripture refers to the Spirit speaking, that means the holy Spirit is a person. We notice, however, that three verses earlier, it is reported that “the angel of the Lord spoke to Philip” (Acts 8:26), but that doesn’t mean the angels is God. In fact, the Bible is replete with examples of God speaking through angels (Genesis 16:7,9,11). The angel, representing God, apparently spoke by means of the holy Spirit.
Acts 10:19,20 – “As Peter was pondering the vision, the Spirit said [to him], ‘There are three men here looking for you. So get up, go downstairs, and accompany the without hesitation, because I have sent them” (NAB).
Acts 11:12 – “The Spirit told me to accompany them” (NAB).
Because the Spirit is said to speak, Trinitarians claim that makes it a person. However, Jesus had foretold that, “the Helper, the holy Spirit which the Father will send in my place, will teach you everything and remind you of everything that I have told you” (John 14:26 AAT). The Father used his holy Spirit to teach Peter about the new covenant and the change of how God was dealing with people. The Spirit was used as God’s instrument, but that doesn’t make it a person. God spoke to Peter through it.
Acts 11:15-17 – “As I began to speak, the holy Spirit fell upon them as it had upon us at the beginning, and I remembered the word of the Lord, how he had said, ‘John baptized with water but you will be baptized with the holy Spirit.’ If then God gave them the same gift he gave to us when we came to believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I to be able to hinder God?” (NAB) – The holy Spirit originated with God, and was given by God, who is the one shown to be in control. The holy Spirit is described as a “gift”, which is indicative of it not being a person.
Acts 13:2 – “The holy Spirit said, ‘Set apart for me Barnabus and Saul for the work in which I have called them'” (NAB). Trinitarians claim this proves the holy Spirit is a person. However, God speaks “through the holy Spirit,” just as he had the virgin Mary to conceive, “through the holy Spirit” (Matthew 1:18,20 NAB). “The impulse for the first missionary effort in Asia Minor is ascribed to the prophets of the Antiochene community, under the inspiration of the holy Spirit” (NAB footnote on Acts 13:1-3). Acts 13:2 does not provide any evidence that the holy Spirit is a person.
“The Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful Spirits and doctrines of demons” (1 Timothy 4:1 NASB). Because the Spirit is said to speak, Trinitarians claim that makes it a person. However, Jesus had foretold that, “the Helper, the holy Spirit which the Father will send in my place, will teach you everything and remind you of everything that I have told you” (John 14:26 AAT). The Father used his holy Spirit to teach Peter about the new covenant and the change of how God was dealing with people. The Spirit was used as God’s instrument, but that doesn’t make it a person. “Human beings moved by the holy Spirit spoke under the influence of God” (2 Peter 1:21 NAB). This is how the Bible was written, and why 1 Timothy 4:1 reads, ‘the spirit says”.
1 John 5:6-8—“This is the one who came through water and blood, Jesus Christ, not by water alone, but by water and blood. The Spirit is the one that testifies, and the Spirit is truth. So there are three that testify, the Spirit, the water, and the blood, and the three are of one accord” (NAB). “The Spirit” is personified in this text, along with “water and blood”. “Water” stands for baptism, and “blood” stands for death. God didn’t get baptized, and didn’t die either (Habakkuk 1:12 NIV), therefore Jesus could not be God. “The Spirit” is obviously not a person because persons are not referenced as “the,” or “that.”
“The Spirit and the Bride say, ‘Come!’” (Revelation 22:17 NJB). Both the holy Spirit and the Bride are personified in this verse. Trinitarians often claim that when the Bible refers to the holy Spirit speaking, it does so in a literal way, thus “proving” the personhood of the holy Spirit. But they usually don’t do that with this verse, because “the Bride,” which is the church, is also said to speak. Obviously, the church is not a literal person, and neither is the holy Spirit.
All the above principles apply to why the holy Spirit is not a person in Revelation 2:7 and 14:13.
having a ‘will’ does. Acts 16:7
Acts 16:6,7 – “They had been prevented by the holy Spirit from preaching the message in the province of Asia. When they came to Mysia, they tried to go on in to Bithynia, but the Spirit of Jesus did not allow them” (NAB). Trinitarians claim that this gives evidence the holy Spirit is a person. This is similar to Acts 5:32, which says, “We are witnesses of these things, as is the holy Spirit that God has given to those who obey him” (NAB). God operates through the holy Spirit and Jesus. By saying “that God has given,” it is evident the holy Spirit is not a person.
‘interceeding’ for us does. Romans 8:26
‘insulted’ does. Hebrews 10:29
Hebrews 10:29 – “Do you not think that a much worse punishment is due the one . . . insults the spirit of grace” (NAB). While most of the Bible is written literally, some of it is written figuratively, so there are many word pictures and figures of speech used in the scriptures. One of these is personification, which has been defined as “the attribution of a personal nature or human characteristics to something nonhuman”.The holy Spirit is sometimes described in the Bible by using personification. Because people are pre-conditioned to think the holy Spirit is a person, the personification of the holy Spirit is often construed, misrepresented, and misunderstood in a way that causes believers in the Trinity doctrine to believe the holy Spirit is a person, “third person of the Trinity”. The holy Spirit is not a person any more than other personified non-persons, such as sin, blood, death, water, etc., are persons. Thus, a key component of the Trinity doctrine is exposed as scripturally false.
searching’ does. 1 Corinthians 2:10
‘knowing’ the thoughts of God does.1 Corinthians 2:11
‘teaching’ does.1 Corinthians 2:13
1 Corinthians 2:10 – “This God has revealed to us through the Spirit. For the Spirit scrutinizes everything, even the depths of God” (NAB). Trinitarians have claimed “scrutinizes” means the holy Spirit is a person. However, the holy Spirit is personified here, as it sometimes is in other scriptures. In this very first mention of the holy Spirit in 1 Corinthians, it is called “the Spirit,” or “his spirit” (NIV). God reveals things through the Spirit, because he operates by using the holy Spirit to accomplish his purposes. The language in this verse (“the Spirit) is indicative of the fact that the holy Spirit is not a person. Without that, there is no Trinity.
1 Corinthians 2:11 – “Among human beings, who knows what pertains a person except the spirit of the person that is within? Similarly, no one knows what pertains to God except the Spirit of God” (NAB). The Spirit of God is compared with the spirit of humans. The activity of this “spirit” is compared with the “spirit” of the self-consciousness of humans. The spirit of humans is to their own individual thoughts as the Spirit of God is to his own thoughts. Holy Spirit is therefore “holy intelligence,” a revelation of the actual mind of God.
1 Corinthians 2:13 – “Words taught by the Spirit”. Trinitarians have claimed this means the holy Spirit is a person, because it is said to ‘teach’. However, the holy Spirit is personified here, as it sometimes is in other scriptures. Notice that, once again, it is called “the Spirit. God reveals things through the Spirit, because he operates by using the holy Spirit to accomplish his purposes. The language in this verse (“the Spirit) is indicative of the fact that there is no personhood of the holy Spirit. Without the spirit being a person, there is no Trinity.
‘leading’ does. Galatians 5:18
Galatians 5:18 – “If you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law” (ESV). Trinitarians have claimed that being “led by the Spirit” is “proof” the holy Spirit is a person. However, “The Spirit’s guidance is a hallmark of the New Covenant, as prophesied in Ezekiel 36:27, where God promises to put His Spirit within His people to enable them to follow His decrees” (Bible Hub Study Bible). “I will put my spirit within you so that you will walk in my statutes, observe my ordinances, and keep them” (Ezekiel 36:27 NAB). God’s putting his Spirit in Christians who live by the New Covenant is proof the holy Spirit is not a person.
‘fellowship’ does. Philippians 2:1
“Participation in the Spirit” (Philippians 2:1 ESV). Since some versions render this as “fellowship of the Spirit”, Trinitarians have claimed this means the holy Spirit is a person. However, the rendering “participation in the Spirit” is more accurate. We can’t participate in a person. But we can “have a share in his Spirit” (1 John 4:13 NJB).
‘sanctifying’ does. 2 Thessalonians 2:13
“We ought always to thank God for you, brothers and sisters loved by the Lord, because God chose you as first fruits to be saved through the sanctifying work of the Spirit and through belief in the truth”—2 Thessalonians 2:13. Trinitarians claim this verse as a “proof” text of their doctrine. If “Lord” in this verse is Jesus, then the three are named. But does that make them a Trinity? Not one aspect of the doctrine is mentioned – No Almightiness, no equality, no eternity, no three-in-one “Godhead,” etc. In this verse, God uses his holy Spirit to save Christians. The holy Spirit is referred to as “the,” so it is obvious that there is no personhood of the holy Spirit, and therefore, cannot be, God.
‘vindicating’ does. 1 Timothy 3:16
“Vindicated in the Spirit” (1 Timothy 3:16 NAB). Since many versions render this as “vindication by the Spirit”, Trinitarians have claimed this means the holy Spirit is a person, however, the NAB rendering is more accurate. The phraseology is similar to, “participation in the Spirit” (Philippians 2:1 ESV). There is no literally being in another person.
I’ve already commented on this issue. In my opinion, based on the relevant verses from the Bible and on rational thinking, the Holy Spirit was/is a person. Of course, I believe none of the three persons of the Trinity even exist. We have proofs that God does not exist.
An objective analysis of the scriptures reveals the holy Spirit is not a person.
Thus the Trinity doctrine collapses under the weight of the scriptures.
I read your analysis and I don’t agree with it. I told you why. The Trinity doctrine collapses because none of the three persons exists! I have given you a couple of proofs that God does not exist, and you found no errors.