Are God, Jesus, and the holy Spirit a Trinity? – 2 Corinthians
The New Testament book of 2 Corinthians was written about 25 years after Jesus’ death and the start of Christianity. Is the Trinity doctrine in 2 Corinthians?
“The Trinity is one of the most important teachings of the Christian faith. It defines God’s very essence and describes how he relates to us”—The Forgotten Trinity, back cover
Since Second Corinthians was written about twenty-fives after the start of Christianity, we would expect to see at least some evidence of such an important doctrine as the Trinity in the letter’s 13 chapters, if it is a true Christian doctrine. Let’s examine scriptures from this book which tell us something about God, Jesus, and the holy Spirit.
“Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God . . . grace to you and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ”—2 Corinthians 1:2 NAB. Paul is an “apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God,” meaning that it is by God’s will that this was the case. Almighty God, and no one else, including Christ, made that decision. We notice that the opening greetings are from God the Father and Jesus Christ, but not from the holy Spirit or the Trinity. If the holy Spirit was a person, the third person of the Trinity, there should be greeting from it also.
“Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ”—2 Corinthians 1:3 NIV. God is said to be “the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.” The Father-Son relationship is emphasized, with God being the primary, and the superior, one. Almighty God is said to be the Father, not the Son, not the holy Spirit, not the imagined Trinity.
“That we might not rely on ourselves but on God, who raises the dead”—2 Corinthians 1:9 NIV. God is the one who is said to ‘raise the dead.’ This would be the same God as in verses 2 & 3 — the Father.
“The Son of God, Jesus Christ”—2 Corinthians 1:19. Jesus is referred to as “the Son of God,” but never by the unscriptural Trinitarian term, ‘God the Son.’
“The one who gives us security with you in Christ is God; he has also put his seal upon us and given the Spirit in our hearts as a first installment”—2 Corinthians 1:21-22 NAB. Trinitarians claim, “this passage is clearly Trinitarian.” Yet, we do well to ask, “Specifically, in what way is it trinitarian?” There is no mention of the three being: (1) one; (2) Almighty; (3) equal; or (4) eternal. Not one aspect of the Trinity doctrine is even mentioned. It says God gave us security in Christ, and God gave us the holy Spirit as a ‘down payment,’ but no Trinity. God the Father is said to be the one in control, who ‘gives Christ and the Spirit.’
“We are the aroma of Christ to God”—2 Corinthians 2:15 NRSV. This shows, for one thing, that “Christ” is not “God,” and is also another piece of evidence that Almighty God the Father is superior to Jesus Christ. Why? Because this is a word picture of “the aroma of Christ to God.” “A burnt offering” is “a smell pleasing to Yahweh” (Leviticus 1:9 NJB). Christ is pictured in the New Testament as a burnt offering to God (Hebrews 10:1-10). “Christ loved us and gave himself up for us as a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God” (Ephesians 5:2 NIV). “Christ died,” (1 Corinthians 15:3), but God cannot die (Habakkuk 1:12).
“In Christ we speak before God with sincerity, as those sent from God”—2 Corinthians 2:17 NIV. This verse provides more evidence that God is the one who is ultimately in control.
“But whenever a person turns to Yahweh, the veil is taken away. Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. But we all . . . are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as from the Lord, the Spirit”—2 Corinthians 3:16-18 LSB margin. Trinitarians have claimed this text proves the holy Spirit is a person, namely God. However, we can see from the context that “Yahweh” is the Spirit, and the holy Spirit is “the Spirit of the living God” (2 Corinthians 3:3 LSB)> Jesus said, “God is a spirit” (John 4:24 GWT), and the context of the verse refers to “Spirit of the living God” (2 Corinthians 3:3), so, obviously, the holy Spirit can’t be God.
“The one who raised Jesus from the dead will also raise us with Jesus”—2 Corinthians 4:14 NAB. Since “Yahweh . . . God . . . never dies” (Habakkuk 1:12 NJB), and Jesus “was dead” (Revelation 1:18), Jesus cannot be God. Christians die and need to be resurrected, just as Jesus needed to be resurrected by God because he “was dead.”
“The one who prepared us for this very thing is God, who has given us the Spirit as a first installment”—2 Corinthians 5:5 NAB. As we look closely at this verse, it provides evidence against the notion that the holy Spirit is a person since it is called “the Spirit” and “a first installment.” Persons are not called “the,” nor are they an “installment.”
“One man died for all . . . him who died and was raised to life”—2 Corinthians 5:14-15 NJB. Since “Yahweh . . . God . . . never dies” and Jesus “was dead” and “God has resurrected this Jesus” (Habakkuk 1:12 NJB; Revelation 1:18; Acts 2:32 NIV), Jesus cannot be God, and cannot be eternal.
“Even if we once knew Christ according to the flesh, yet we now know him so no longer”—2 Corinthians 5:16 NAB. Trinitarians claim that Jesus Christ experienced a bodily resurrection, but this verse weighs against such an understanding.
“God, who has reconciled us to himself through Christ . . . God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ . . . we implore you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God . . . he made him be sin who did not know sin, so that we might become the righteousness of God in him”—2 Corinthians 5:18-20 NAB. These statements show that God operates through Jesus Christ. The goal is for humans to be reconciled to God through Christ.
“I WILL BE THEIR GOD . . . AND I WILL BE A FATHER TO YOU . . . SAYS YAHWEH ALMIGHTY” (2 Corinthians 6:16-18 LSB margin). God the Father, not Jesus Christ or the holy Spirit, is clearly shown to be “the Lord Almighty”, in contrast to the Trinity doctrine, which asserts: “The Father is Almighty, the Son Almighty, and the Holy Spirit Almighty” (Athanasian Creed).
“Thanksgiving to God . . . thanksgiving to God . . . glorifying God . . . the surpassing grace of God . . . Thanks be to God”—9:11-15 NAB. All these statements are indications of the overarching supremacy of God.
“The God and Father of the Lord Jesus, who is to be praised forever”—11:31 NIV. “The Father” is said to be Jesus’ “God.” That makes him superior to Jesus, and eliminates the equality claim of the Trinity doctrine! This means the Trinity doctrine is contradicted by 2 Corinthians.
“He was crucified in weakness, yet he lives by God’s power”—13:4 NIV. Yes, Jesus actually “died” (1 Corinthians 15:3). On the other hand, “Yahweh . . . God . . . never dies” (Habakkuk 1:12 NJB). So, according to the scriptures, Jesus cannot be Almighty God.
“May the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all”—13:14 NIV. Trinitarians refer to this verse as “one of the clearest Trinitarian passages in the New Testament” (NAB footnote) and one of their “proofs” that “the faith of the New Testament is an implicitly Trinitarian faith” (The Forgotten Trinity, pages 163,164). However, there is no presentation of the Trinity in this verse. There is no verse, including this one, anywhere in the Bible that articulates that God, Jesus, and the holy Spirit equal “one God.” Actually, a careful reading of this verse contradicts the Trinity doctrine. God, Jesus and the holy Spirit are presented as entirely separate and distinct entities. “The fellowship of the holy Spirit” doesn’t mean it’s a person. It is a “common sharing in the Spirit” by Christians who have a “supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ” (Philippians 2:1 NIV; 1:19 NJKV; KJV). “Supply of” and “common sharing” are strong evidences the Spirit is not a person. An even better translation of the verse is:
“The blessing of the Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God and the participation in the holy Spirit be with you all” (2 Corinthians 13:14 AAT). This verse indicates that Christians are blessed to have participation in the holy Spirit, but there is no indication the holy Spirit is a person.
Thus, the book of 2 Corinthians provides powerful evidence against the Trinity doctrine, and for the superiority of God the Father over his Son, Jesus Christ, and the fact that the holy Spirit is not a person. Therefore, the Trinity is not found in 2 Corinthians.
21 thoughts on “Are God, Jesus, and the holy Spirit a Trinity? – 2 Corinthians”
BA1: “The Trinity is one of the most important teachings of the Christian faith. It defines God’s very essence and describes how he relates to us”—The Forgotten Trinity, back cover
GW1: God does not exist, and this has been proven.
BA1: Since Second Corinthians was written over twenty years after the start of Christianity, we would expect to see at least some evidence of such an important doctrine as the Trinity in the Letter’s 13 chapters, if it is a true Christian doctrine. Let’s examine scriptures from this book which tell us something about God, Jesus, and the holy Spirit.
GW1: Jesus probably existed, but was not divine. God certainly has never existed. And there is no good evidence for the existence of the Holy Spirit.
BA1: “Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God . . . grace to you and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ”—1:2 NAB. Paul is an “apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God,” meaning that is by God’s will that this was the case. God, no one else, including Christ, made that decision. We notice that the opening greetings are from God the Father and Jesus Christ, but not from the holy Spirit or the Trinity.
GW1: God does not make decisions since God does not exist.
BA1: “Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ”—1:3 NIV. God is said to be “the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.” The Father-Son relationship is emphasized, with God being the primary one.
GW1: If God did exist (he doesn’t), he would have no children, messengers, prophets, or assistants. He would have no need for them. He would do all his own communicating.
BA1: “That we might not rely on ourselves but on God, who raises the dead”—1:9 NIV. God is the one who is said to ‘raise the dead.’
GW1: There is no good evidence that any resurrection of a dead person has ever occurred.
BA1: “The Son of God, Jesus Christ”—1:19. Jesus is referred to as “the Son of God,” but never by the Trinitarian term, ‘God the Son.’
GW1: Once again, if God did exist (he doesn’t), he would have no children, messengers, prophets, or assistants. He would have no need for them. He would do all his own communicating.
BA1: “The one who gives us security with you in Christ is God; he has also put his seal upon us and given the Spirit in our hearts as a first installment”—1:21,22 NAB. Trinitarians claim, “this passage is clearly Trinitarian.” Yet, we do well to ask, “Specifically, in what way is it trinitarian?” There is no mention of the three being: (1) one; (2) Almighty; (3) equal; (4) eternal. Not one aspect of the Trinity doctrine is even mentioned. It says God gave us security in Christ, and God gave us the holy Spirit as a ‘down payment,’ but no Trinity.
GW1: The idea of the Trinity was inferred from just a few Bible verses. It is not well supported.
BA1: “We are the aroma of Christ to God”—2:15 NRSV. This is another piece of evidence that Almighty God the Father is superior to Jesus Christ.
GW1: Well of course! Jesus implied that God, his father, was superior to him. But Jesus was mistaken in his belief that God exists.
BA1: “In Christ we speak before God with sincerity, as those sent from God”—2:17 NIV. This verse provides more evidence that God is the one who is ultimately in control.
GW1: God does not exist, and this has been proven by many arguments, including my Holocaust argument.
You said above that “Trinitarians claim that Jesus was bodily resurrected…” BUT YES HE WAS so what is your point? Jesus was also said to BE the Spirit, which is why He could not be present in more than one form at one time, so a trinity cannot now presently exist because the Spirit [as given at Pentecost] and Jesus as two parts of that trinity are actually the same “person” in concept being the Son in human flesh and then the Son in Spirit ‘flesh’ once resurrected. While in the flesh Jesus could only refer to the Spirit to come as a separate third person because that person did not yet exist because “The Spirit was not yet”. He treated His future existence in ‘Spirit’ form as that of a separate identity, as “I will not leave you as orphans, I will come to you”. “The Lord is the Spirit”.
We’re pleased to respond to your statements, as follows:
CR—You said above that “Trinitarians claim that Jesus was bodily resurrected…” BUT YES HE WAS so what is your point?
BA—No, Jesus was not “bodily resurrected”:
“Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit” (1 Peter 3:18 NIV). Notice that “Christ was put to death in the flesh”. Christ suffered on earth, but God didn’t because “God is a spirit” (John 4:24 GWT), and has never been a man (Numbers 23:19; Hosea 11:9). “Christ died” (1 Corinthians 15:3), which is something that God cannot do (Habakkuk 1:12 NIV). ‘God resurrected Jesus’ (Acts 2:32 HCSB), tells us Jesus can’t be God, since Jesus could not bring himself back to life.
CR—Jesus was also said to BE the Spirit,
BA—No, Yahweh is said to be the Spirit:
“But whenever a person turns to Yahweh, the veil is taken away. Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. But we all . . . are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as from the Lord, the Spirit”—2 Corinthians 3:16-18 LSB margin. Trinitarians have claimed this text proves the holy Spirit is a person, namely God. However, we can see from the context that “Yahweh” is the Spirit, and the holy Spirit is “the Spirit of the living God” (2 Corinthians 3:3 LSB)> Jesus said, “God is a spirit” (John 4:24 GWT), and the context of the verse refers to “Spirit of the living God” (2 Corinthians 3:3), so, obviously, the holy Spirit can’t be God.
CR—which is why He could not be present in more than one form at one time, so a trinity cannot now presently exist because the Spirit [as given at Pentecost] and Jesus as two parts of that trinity are actually the same “person” in concept being the Son in human flesh and then the Son in Spirit ‘flesh’ once resurrected.
BA—The scriptures never refer to a Trinity of any sort:
Mark 12:29 – “Jesus answered, “The foremost is, ‘HEAR, O ISRAEL! Yahweh OUR GOD IS ONE Yahweh” (LSB margin) – The greatest commandment is to love God, not Jesus or Trinity. “One” is the Greek word “heis”, meaning the numerical one, not a compound unity, as Trinitarians would have us believe. Not two or three, not divided, not Trinity. The main teaching of Jesus, he said, was that ‘Yahweh God is one person only’, “God is only one [Greek: “heis”] (Galatians 3:20 NASB), which flatly contradicts the Trinity doctrine of a 3-in-one God. “Heis” is the numeral one.
CR—While in the flesh Jesus could only refer to the Spirit to come as a separate third person because that person did not yet exist because “The Spirit was not yet”.
BA—John 7:39 – “He said this about the Spirit. Those who believed in Jesus were going to receive the Spirit, for the Spirit had not yet been given because Jesus had not yet been glorified” (CSB). Trinitarians claim the holy Spirit is a person, and we see that bias reflected in most translations of this verse. “By this he meant the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were later to receive” (NIV). However, we see that twice in this verse, the holy Spirit is described as “the Spirit”, which is not descriptive of a person. Trinitarians claim the holy Spirit existed from eternity as the 3rd person of the Trinity (Genesis 1:2), and there are others who claim the holy Spirit didn’t even exist until it was poured out at Pentecost (Acts 2). The scriptures prove both wrong. “The LORD . . . taking some of the spirit that was on Moses, he bestowed it on the seventy elders, and as the spirit came to rest on them, they prophesied, but did not continue” (Numbers 11:25 NAB). “The Spirit of Yahweh came upon him mightily” (Judges 14:6 LSB). These actions show that the spirit existed in Old Testament times, but never as a person.
CR—He treated His future existence in ‘Spirit’ form as that of a separate identity, as “I will not leave you as orphans, I will come to you”. “The Lord is the Spirit”.
BA—Jesus has always been a separate identity from his Father.
“The testimony of two witnesses is true. I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me” (John 8:17,18 NIV).
The holy Spirit exists, but not as a person, as noted above.
“John bore witness, ‘I saw the spirit descend from heaven like a dove and it remained on him” (John 1:32 ESV).
Persons are not described by the pronoun “it”. Persons are described by the pronouns “he”, “she”, “him”, “her”, etc.
You are talking about different spirits with different contexts and you are totally ignoring the common useage of words like “when he…”. and “I will send Him…”
and much more. So this would need an in depth to and fro regarding the actual language and then the correct translation of these words. Neither of us has time to do this on this platform.
CR—You are talking about different spirits with different contexts and you are totally ignoring the common useage of words like “when he…”. and “I will send Him…”
BA—We don’t think so. It appears that you, like Trinitarians do, take instances where the holy Spirit is personified, and take those as evidence of its supposed personhood.
Trinitarians ignore the fact that other impersonal things are personified in the Bible, such as:
sin—Romans 5:21; 612,1416; Genesis 4:7
blood—Genesis 4:10; 1 John 5:7-8
the spirit–1 John 5:7-8
water—Psalm 77:16; 1 John 5:7-8
rivers—Psalm 98:8
law of sin—Romans 7:23
flesh—Galatians 5:24
blood of Christ—Ephesians 2:13
sprinkled blood—Hebrews 12:24
creation—Romans 8:19
CR—and much more. So this would need an in depth to and fro regarding the actual language and then the correct translation of these words.
BA—Yes, due to Trinitarian bias, many translation render certain verses of the NT Greek text in a way that makes it appear that the holy Spirit is a person. Our website has much information regarding this practice.
CR– Neither of us has time to do this on this platform.
BA—We at BA do have such time. We believe that any and all issues that are as important as this one deserve a proper investment of our time and attention.
We’re sorry if you do not have such time.
OK
Surely the Spirit of Jesus is different to the Spirit of God. You speak as if the ‘Holy Spirit of God’ is the ONLY Spirit.
And surely you are not saying that Jesus’ body was not resurrected? Put your hand in my side etc. see the holes in my hands. How can you possibly erect such a charade and ignore so much scripture in such contrast to what you say, and all to deny believers the assurance of the Spirit of Christ within them, so as to perpetuate the old law covenant. Do you deny this is what you are doing? I am open to correction but it must be by legitimate scripture.
CR—And surely you are not saying that Jesus’ body was not resurrected?
BA—No, Jesus’ body was not resurrected.
“God has resurrected this Jesus” (Acts 2:32 HCSB), as a “life-giving spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45 NAB).
“Christ died for our sins” (1 Corinthians 15:3).
“We have been made holy by the sacrifice of the body of Jesus Christ once for all” (Hebrews 10:10 NIV).
Christ’s body was sacrificed as a ‘whole burnt offering’ (Hebrews 10:5-6).
CR— Put your hand in my side etc. see the holes in my hands.
BA—“Though the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them” (John 20:26 NIV).
The incident you’re to is one of a number of appearances of the resurrected Jesus, when he “appeared in a different form” (Mark 16:12).
He materialized different bodies temporarily.
“As they were talking about all this, there he was, standing among them. Startled and terrified, they thought they were seeing a ghost” (Luke 24:36 REB).
Jesus went through locked doors and walls, which only a spirit can do (John 20:19).
CR— How can you possibly erect such a charade and ignore so much scripture in such contrast to what you say,
BA–We reject such characterization. Everything we post here is supported by the scriptures, which we both quote and cite specifically, so that anyone can check for themselves. In fact, we encourage all readers to do their own investigation.
CR—and all to deny believers the assurance of the Spirit of Christ within them
BA—We deny believers no such thing, but encourage all believers to “be filled with the Spirit” (Ephesians 5:18).
CR—so as to perpetuate the old law covenant
BA—We don’t know where you got such an idea from. There are several articles on this website which scripturally elucidate the fact that the Old Covenant has been “cancelled” and is “obsolete and outdated” (Colossians 2:14 NIV; Hebrews 8:13 NIV).
CR— Do you deny this is what you are doing?
BA—Of course. Such an action & attitude on our part would be ludicrous.
CR— I am open to correction but it must be
BA—Good. We pray that you will take to heart the scriptures presented here.
We’ll be happy to discuss this further with you and answer any questions you have.
CR—Surely the Spirit of Jesus is different to the Spirit of God.
BA—No, they’re the same thing. We can see this from the following:
Acts 16:6,7 – “They had been prevented by the holy Spirit from preaching the message in the province of Asia. When they came to Mysia, they tried to go on in to Bithynia, but the Spirit of Jesus did not allow them” (NAB). “The holy Spirit is the same as “the Spirit of Jesus” in these verses. Trinitarians claim that these verses give evidence the holy Spirit is a person. The terminology is similar to Acts 5:32, which says, “We are witnesses of these things, as is the holy Spirit that God has given to those who obey him” (NAB). God operates through the holy Spirit and Jesus. By saying “the holy Spirit that God has given,” it is evident the holy Spirit is not a person. Acts 16:6,7 is also similar to: “Exalted to the right hand of God, he received the promise of the holy Spirit from the Father and poured it forth, as you both see and hear” ( Acts 2:33 NAB). Since “God” has Jesus at his right hand, and he channels the holy Spirit to Jesus, God is identified as the Father. Additionally, the holy Spirit is called “it,”which gives additional evidence the holy Spirit is not a person.
CR—You speak as if the ‘Holy Spirit of God’ is the ONLY Spirit.
BA—No, “angels” are “spirits” (Hebrews 1:7 NIV), but, of course, they’re not the holy Spirit.
Therefore as far as a “spirit” goes, the in introduction of Jesus to what already existed before, makes no difference. His Spirit then is the same as the “Holy Spirit” which always existed, Therefore the addition of Jesus alters nothing in terms of intimacy with God or the imparted knowledge of His grace., and the transferability of His ‘person’.
Contrary to your NAB quote above, The NASB Acts 2-33 does NOT say “it” but says “…this which you both see and hear”.
CR—Therefore as far as a “spirit” goes, the in introduction of Jesus to what already existed before, makes no difference. His Spirit then is the same as the “Holy Spirit” which always existed,
BA—“The holy Spirit” (Luke 12:12 NAB) is “the Spirit of God” (Matthew 3:14), “the Spirit of your Father” (Matthew 10:20).
Since God has existed “from eternity” (Psalm 90:2 NAB), his spirit, which is tantamount to his “power” (Genesis 1:2; Psalm 104:30; Zechariah 4:6; Luke 1:17; Acts 1:8), has existed from eternity, but not as an independent person.
The holy Spirit is described by the personal pronoun “it”,indicating it is not a person (John 1:32 ESV; John 14:17 NAB); Acts 2:33; 8:16; 11:15 NAB; Romans 8:16,26,27 NAB; 1 Peter 1:11 NAB).
CR—Therefore the addition of Jesus alters nothing in terms of intimacy with God or the imparted knowledge of His grace., and the transferability of His ‘person’.
BA—No, it doesn’t.
Christians can be “filled with the holy Spirit” (Acts 2:4 NAB), and receive “a portion of [God’s] spirit” (Acts 2:17 NAB), which indicates its power and relevancy, and importance for Christians, but these scriptures give evidence it is not a person.
CR–Contrary to your NAB quote above, The NASB Acts 2-33 does NOT say “it” but says “…this which you both see and hear”.
BA—THe New American Bible (NAB) is a different translation than the New American Standard Bible (NASB).
The slight difference in the renderings of Acts 2:33 (“it” & “which”) in reality make no difference.
They both give evidence the holy Spirit is not a person.
The emphasis is not on the “which” but on the “this”. I think we will have to leave it at that, the field is yours. Thanks.
CR—The emphasis is not on the “which” but on the “this”. I think we will have to leave it at that, the field is yours. Thanks.
BA—“God says, ‘that I will pour out a portion of my spirit upon all flesh'”—Acts 2:17 NAB
This accurate translation of the Greek text helps us to see that the holy Spirit isn’t a person.
In Paul’s letters, we see opening salutations such as this:
“Grace and peace from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Savior” (Titus 1:4 LSB), but none from the holy Spirit, which is another clue it isn’t a person.
“He became a life giving Spirit”
CR—“He became a life giving Spirit”
BA—True!
Regarding Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Bible tells us:
“Put to death in the flesh, he was brought to life in the spirit” (1 Peter 3:18 NAB).
“The last Adam became a life-giving spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45 NAB) at his resurrection.
Jesus was just a man. He did not come back to life. Also, God does not exist. We now know and have proven this.
None of these characters actually exist: God, the Holy Spirit, and Jesus Christ. Jesus of Nazareth did exist.
If God did exist, he would be a spiritual entity. There would be no good reason to separately identify his spirit as the Holy Spirit.
Thank you. I will take the field. We now know and have proven that God does not exist. So, the Trinity idea is a bust.
GW- I will take the field.
Mrs. Biblia-I will take the field.Atheism is a bust. We have now proven God does exist. On this site, no-one takes you serious as to your foolish belief. I know you will come back with some derogatory comment(s). God does exist and so will your judgement one day. I actually feel sorry for you Gary. You are a lost soul.
Argument 4b
Argument Against the Existence of God Based on Failure of Meetings: Gary Whittenberger, 2-12-2026
1. If God did exist, then he would meet with all human persons during the course of their lives before their deaths.
2. This has never happened.
3. Therefore, God does not exist.