Browsed by
Tag: Persian records

BIBLE DATES PROVEN TO BE ACCURATE

BIBLE DATES PROVEN TO BE ACCURATE

Comments 89 comments

In contrast to many other religious works, such as Hindu, Buddhist, Confucian, the Apocryphal Books, the Book of Mormon, Doctrines and Covenants, etc., for example, the Bible has a number of dates that can be cross-checked with surviving ancient records and accurately related to our modern calendar. These facts are just some of the ways that the Bible has proven to authentic and genuine. Some examples follow.

“In the ninth year Zedekiah’s reign, on the tenth day of the month of the tenth month, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon marched against Jerusalem with his whole army. He encamped outside the city and built site works all around it. The city was kept under siege until the eleventh year of King Zedekiah”—2 Kings 25:1 NIV read more

The Book of Esther – History or Fiction?

The Book of Esther – History or Fiction?

Comments 0 Comment

The book of Esther is viewed today by a majority of scholars as non-historical. Yet the story itself is recounted candidly, and there is nothing within it to suggest that it is fictional. Mir­acles or other “impossible” occurrences are totally absent. Critical scholars are bothered, however, by seeming exaggerations, perceived inaccuracies, and certain omissions, such as:

  • The length of the 180-day feast (Esther 1:1-4) seems excessive.
  • The six months of perfuming with oil, and the additional six months of beautifying with spices (Esther 2:12) seem extreme.
  • The book claims that there were 127 Persian provinces (Esther 1:1), while the historian Herodotus speaks of only 20.
  • The notion of a Persian decree being irrevocable (Esther 1:19; Esther 8:8) is regarded as doubtful—but see Daniel 6.
  • Planning for a massacre of Jews almost a year in advance (Esther 3:8-15) strikes critical scholars as unlikely.
  • It seems too coincidental that Haman would turn out to be a descendant of Agag the Amalekite, the enemy of Israel, whom Saul failed to execute in obedience to Yahweh’s direction through Samuel  (Esther 3:1; see 1 Samuel 15).
  • Contrary to the Biblical account, Herodotus identified Xerxes’ queen as Amestris, not Vashti.
  • Although the names Mordecai and that of Haman’s son Parshandatha (Esther 9:7) are attested elsewhere during the Persian period, Xerxes is the only indisputable historical figure in the book.
  • Archaeological data from the Persian period has not specifi­cally confirmed the story’s historicity.
  • It is the only Old Testament book: (1) in which neither “God,” nor his name “Yahweh,” are specifically mentioned; (2) no manuscript copies have been found among the Dead Sea Scrolls. Another factor is that the book is not quoted in the New Testament.
  • Things important to the ancient Jews, such as the Law, sacrifice, and the Temple in Jerusalem are not mentioned.
  • Esther is often read as a satire addressing the needs of Jews outside of the Holy Land. Yet these challenges, though not insignificant, are not, in fact, as overwhelming as they might first appear:

    • read more

    WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com

    Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy