Browsed by
Tag: eyewitness accounts

Can We Be Sure We Have Eyewitness Testimony in the Gospels?

Can We Be Sure We Have Eyewitness Testimony in the Gospels?

“Even though we might desperately want to know the identities of the authors of the earliest Gospels, we simply don’t have sufficient evidence. The books were written anonymously and evidently not by eyewitnesses”—Bart D. Ehrman

So says the popular agnostic Bible scholar, who has quite a following. While such claims were rare prior to the 1800’s, they have been increasing, and ever more so in recent times..

How do you know you were born? Yes, you’re alive now, and you’ve been told everyone is born. Superman is supposed to be from the planet Krypton. Maybe that’s how you arrived on earth. Such an idea has about as much credibility as Ehrman’s claims. read more

ANONYMOUS FOLKLORE, OR EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS, OF JESUS ?

ANONYMOUS FOLKLORE, OR EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS, OF JESUS ?

A popular myth is spread that the gospels, and the New Testament historical accounts, are simply embellished oral traditions and legends about a man named Jesus, who was likely a real, historical figure. As other articles on this site have shown, the entire New Testament was written within the lifetime of the Apostle John, who apparently lived on about 60-70 years after Jesus’ death. This is certainly believable since there are alive today a number of people who were living back during WWII, which ended in 1945.

Peter, one of Jesus’ most intimate of his 12 apostles, besides writing 2 general letters to Christians, apparently shared with his younger associate in Christ, Mark, details that enabled Mark to accurately record his gospel (1 Peter 5:13). In Peter’s 2nd general letter to Christians,  notice what he had to say:

“We have not depended on made-up stories in making known to you the mighty coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. With our own eyes we saw his greatness”—2 Peter 1:16 GNB

Although many were predictably beginning to “turn away from the truth, and turn aside to myths” (2 Timothy 4:4 NIV), because “false teachers . . . will exploit you with fabricated words” (2 Peter 2:1-3). This was not the case with true Christians who stuck with God’s reliably revealed word, the Bible.

Luke, written by Luke, the meticulous researcher, was written to, and dedicated to, Theophilus, who was probably one of Luke’s patrons. 

=&0=&things accomplished=&1=&down=&2=&from=&3=&beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word” (Luke 1:1,2 NLT)

With this in mind, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I too decided to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus.” (Luke 1:3 NIV)

A patron would obviously know who he was patronizing, so Luke couldn’t have been anonymous! Furthermore, notice who Luke says he interviewed:

“Those who from the first were eyewitnesses.” (Luke 1:2 NIV).

Luke’s gospel was written by Luke, who interviewed many people who were actual eyewitnesses to the events that Luke recorded in his book.

“Because of this, the rumor spread among the believers that this disciple would not die. But Jesus did not say that he would not die; he only said, ‘If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you?’ This is the disciple who testifies to these things and who wrote them down. We know that his testimony is true.” (John 21:23,24 NIV)

The anonymous disciple mentioned in verse 23, and other places in the 4th gospel, was known early on to be the Apostle John. Verse 24 says that he wrote the book. So the gospel of John was written by Jesus’ most intimate apostle, who was an eyewitness to many of the events recored in the gospel of John.

“Matthew the tax collector”—( read more

Is the New Testament Based on Eyewitness Testimony?

Is the New Testament Based on Eyewitness Testimony?

Is the New Testament based on eyewitness testimony? Let’s examine the Bible to find out.

Is the NT based on eyewitness testimony?
Is the NT based on eyewitness testimony?

“Draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses.” (Luke 1:1,2 NIV) The Bible writer Luke based his accounts on eyewitness testimony. read more

Who Wrote 1 & 2 Peter?

Who Wrote 1 & 2 Peter?

“Symeon Peter, a slave and apostle of Jesus Christ, to those who have received a faith of equal value to ours” (2 Peter 1:1 NAB). The opening verse of 2 Peter attributes its writing to the apostle Peter.

“This is now, beloved, the second letter I am =&0=&The writer of 1 Peter clearly says this is the second letter he is writing, which implies that 1 Peter is his first.

“We had been eyewitnesses of his majesty . . . We ourselves heard this voice come from heaven while we were with him on the =&1=&The writer of 2 Peter counts himself as present at Jesus’ transfiguration. The gospel writers Matthew, Mark and Luke place Peter at the Transfiguration (Matthew 17:1-11; Mark 9:2-11; Luke 9:28-36).

First and Second Peter both claim writership by Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ (1 Peter 1:1; 2 Peter 1:1,17-18), and “a fellow elder, a witness of Christ’s sufferings and one who also will share in the glory to be revealed” (1 Peter 5:1). The early church unhesitatingly received 1 Peter as authentic. Some examples are as follows:

  • Papias (60- 135 CE) noted that “Mark is mentioned by Peter in his first epistle” (Eusebius, History, 2.15).
  • Clement of Rome (30-101 CE); The Didache (an anonymous, early-second-century A.D. work dealing with a variety of doctrin­al and practical matters of import to the early Christian church); and Polycarp  (69-156 CE), all quoted from 1 Peter.
  • Irenaeus (130-200 CE) cited 1 Peter, using the apostle’s name [Against Heresies, 4.9.2; 4.16.5).
  • Eusebius summarized the canonical discussion by placing letters in four categories [History, 3.25):
  • read more

    WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com